Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts and applications relating to the principle components of project management and processes

Review the Portfolio Project instructions in the Module 8 folder. This Portfolio Project Milestone completes the requirements for the Section 1: Principle Components Discussion, which is common to both options.
Using the essay paper framework that you drafted in Module 2, add substantive content to the remaining Section 1: Principle Components Discussion items, which describes the project management standards and processes based on the Project Management Institute’s A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge® (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). For each of the following items not previously completed in the Module 2 Portfolio Project Milestone, include a brief, yet substantive synopsis (typically, 1- to 2-paragraphs for each subsection level-2 bullet item):
Project, Program, and Portfolio Management distinction
Project Selection
Project Charter (plus project charter template in appendix)
Project Organization
Project Planning
Project Scheduling
Project Estimating
Monitoring and Control
Project Closure
Reference page(s) listing any appropriate references cited.
Appendices1-2 page Project Charter template
Please note that the project charter template must address the unique requirements of a small-to-medium size projects in a global organization.
Include the Portfolio Project option that you selected as part of the cover page and the paper title to confirm which scenario-specific project management simulation you will complete and that aligns with your Portfolio Project option.
Your Portfolio Project Milestone essay, which includes the completed Section 1: Principle Components Discussion (now expanded to approximately 5-6 pages), must include substantive, well-supported content.
Support your assignment with a minimum of four scholarly references, which may include the course textbook, the PMBOK® Guide, and designated readings in addition to your research. The CSU Global library is a good place to locate these sources, and the Project Management Resources Guide (Links to an external site.) is a great place to start. The written section should follow the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.). Consult the Sample Paper (Links to an external site.) template for more information on how to organize the paper and review the rubric for specific grading criteria.
PJM500 Mod 5 PM
PJM500 Mod 5 PM
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
15 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required and expanded components, as specified in the assignment. Milestone includes headings for all project components submitted and those serving as placeholders for upcoming submissions.
12 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
9 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
6 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
25 to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of course materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
20 to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
15 to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
10 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation
30 to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts and applications relating to the principle components of project management and processes.
24 to >18.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
18 to >12.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
12 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and is in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in the proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error.
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors.
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors.
10 pts

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00
Client Reviews
4.9
Sitejabber
4.6
Trustpilot
4.8
Our Guarantees
100% Confidentiality
Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.
Original Writing
We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.
Timely Delivery
No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.
Money Back
If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00
Power up Your Academic Success with the
Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.
Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.