Evaluate the work of these authors and determine whether they have successfully answered their posited research questions, and if so, what are the implications for the study of judicial politics generally.

The article reviews should look for common themes amongst the readings, disagreements between the readings, and your original thoughts about why you feel one view is better/worse than the others presented by the authors.
Additional fertile ground for constructing a response paper is a detailed analysis of the research design, data used, and findings of the authors, and whether you see any limitations or successes on the authors’ parts in these respective studies.
Again, the goal is to critically evaluate the work of these authors and determine whether they have successfully answered their posited research questions, and if so, what are the implications
for the study of judicial politics generally.
Use only the sources added for citations.