How does it illuminate law’s potential for social change, if at all?
Legal Pluralism and Contemporary Issues
As we’ve discussed so far, law can involve many types of laws in one place and many people
have varying views of law. Using a legal pluralism perspective, analyze a contemporary social
issue (e.g., immigration, vaccine/mask mandates, abortion) in which there are conflicting laws
(e.g., federal vs. state/local, or two countries). How does this issue highlight the ideas of legal
pluralism? How does it illuminate law’s potential for social change, if at all? Finally how does it
reinforce the idea that Calavita discusses in Chapter 2 that the type of law reflects the type of
I have uploaded the readings that you need to use.
The paper must be 4-6 double spaced typed pages (12 font, 1” margins)